AI Navigate

Age Predictors Through the Lens of Generalization, Bias Mitigation, and Interpretability: Reflections on Causal Implications

arXiv cs.LG / 3/18/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper analyzes how chronological age predictors struggle with out-of-distribution generalization due to exogenous attributes such as race, gender, or tissue, highlighting the need for invariant representations.
  • It proposes an interpretable neural network model based on adversarial representation learning to mitigate bias and support fairer, more robust predictions.
  • Using publicly available mouse transcriptomic datasets, the authors compare the proposed model against conventional ML models and observe results consistent with a prior study on Elamipretide effects in mouse tissues.
  • The work discusses the limitations of inferring causal interpretations from purely predictive models and outlines the boundary between predictive performance and causal understanding.

Abstract

Chronological age predictors often fail to achieve out-of-distribution (OOD) gen- eralization due to exogenous attributes such as race, gender, or tissue. Learning an invariant representation with respect to those attributes is therefore essential to improve OOD generalization and prevent overly optimistic results. In predic- tive settings, these attributes motivate bias mitigation; in causal analyses, they appear as confounders; and when protected, their suppression leads to fairness. We coherently explore these concepts with theoretical rigor and discuss the scope of an interpretable neural network model based on adversarial representation learning. Using publicly available mouse transcriptomic datasets, we illustrate the behavior of this model relative to conventional machine learning models. We observe that the outcome of this model is consistent with the predictive results of a published study demonstrating the effects of Elamipretide on mouse skeletal and cardiac muscle. We conclude by discussing the limitations of deriving causal interpretation from such purely predictive models.