AI Navigate

Not All News Is Equal: Topic- and Event-Conditional Sentiment from Finetuned LLMs for Aluminum Price Forecasting

arXiv cs.LG / 3/11/2026

Ideas & Deep AnalysisIndustry & Market MovesModels & Research

Key Points

  • The study investigates how lightweight, finetuned large language models (LLMs) can extract sentiment signals from English and Chinese news headlines to improve aluminum price forecasting.
  • Sentiment scores derived from multiple news sources are combined with traditional financial data such as metal indices, exchange rates, inflation, and energy prices for prediction.
  • The research shows that an LSTM model using sentiment data from a finetuned Qwen3 model performs significantly better in volatile market periods, achieving a Sharpe ratio of 1.04 versus 0.23 for models using only tabular data.
  • The study highlights the differentiated impact of news source, topic, and event type on aluminum price prediction, providing deeper insight into when and why sentiment data improves forecasts.
  • The evaluation spans data from 2007 to 2024 on the Shanghai Metal Exchange, focusing on both predictive accuracy and economic utility through simulated trading strategies.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2603.09085 (cs)
[Submitted on 10 Mar 2026]

Title:Not All News Is Equal: Topic- and Event-Conditional Sentiment from Finetuned LLMs for Aluminum Price Forecasting

View a PDF of the paper titled Not All News Is Equal: Topic- and Event-Conditional Sentiment from Finetuned LLMs for Aluminum Price Forecasting, by Alvaro Paredes Amorin and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:By capturing the prevailing sentiment and market mood, textual data has become increasingly vital for forecasting commodity prices, particularly in metal markets. However, the effectiveness of lightweight, finetuned large language models (LLMs) in extracting predictive signals for aluminum prices, and the specific market conditions under which these signals are most informative, remains under-explored. This study generates monthly sentiment scores from English and Chinese news headlines (Reuters, Dow Jones Newswires, and China News Service) and integrates them with traditional tabular data, including base metal indices, exchange rates, inflation rates, and energy prices. We evaluate the predictive performance and economic utility of these models through long-short simulations on the Shanghai Metal Exchange from 2007 to 2024. Our results demonstrate that during periods of high volatility, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models incorporating sentiment data from a finetuned Qwen3 model (Sharpe ratio 1.04) significantly outperform baseline models using tabular data alone (Sharpe ratio 0.23). Subsequent analysis elucidates the nuanced roles of news sources, topics, and event types in aluminum price forecasting.
Comments:
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.09085 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2603.09085v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.09085
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Alvaro Paredes Amorin [view email]
[v1] Tue, 10 Mar 2026 01:54:12 UTC (4,357 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Not All News Is Equal: Topic- and Event-Conditional Sentiment from Finetuned LLMs for Aluminum Price Forecasting, by Alvaro Paredes Amorin and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
Current browse context:
cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Links to Code Toggle
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.