Nemotron 3 Super and the no free lunch problem

My initial impression of Nemotron 3 Super is that it feels overly locked down. What concerns me is not just the refusal itself, but how broadly the model seems to classify things as infringement or misuse. Even with clear caveats and an obviously absurd creative context, it still failed to produce anything functional. Not a toned down version, not a safe substitute, not even a useful structural fallback. That makes me wonder how much this kind of overrestriction affects abstraction, reasoning, and overall usability. If the model is filtering too aggressively, it may not just block edge cases, it may also weaken its ability to interpret intent properly. This is only an initial impression, but it does make me think there is no free lunch with heavily constrained models. Are other people noticing the same thing with Nemotron 3 Super?