Article URL: https://blog.icml.cc/2026/03/18/on-violations-of-llm-review-policies/
Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47437101
Points: 143
# Comments: 130
2% of ICML papers desk rejected because the authors used LLM in their reviews
Hacker News / 3/19/2026
📰 NewsSignals & Early TrendsTools & Practical Usage
Key Points
- ICML reported that about 2% of submitted papers were desk rejected due to violations of the conference's policy on LLMs in the review process.
- The policy prohibits using large language models to generate or edit peer reviews, emphasizing human judgment in evaluation.
- The post outlines examples of violations and clarifications, indicating ongoing enforcement and updates to review guidelines.
- The incident highlights broader signals of AI-assisted workflows in research and the need for clear, consistent guidelines across venues.
Related Articles
Astral to Join OpenAI
Dev.to
I Built a MITM Proxy to See What Claude Code Actually Sends to Anthropic
Dev.to
Your AI coding agent is installing vulnerable packages. I built the fix.
Dev.to
ChatGPT Prompt Engineering for Freelancers: Unlocking Efficient Client Communication
Dev.to
PearlOS. We gave swarm intelligence a local desktop environment and code control to self-evolve. Has been pretty incredible to see so far. Open source and free if you want your own.
Reddit r/LocalLLaMA
