AI Navigate

Quantum Amplitude Estimation for Catastrophe Insurance Tail-Risk Pricing: Empirical Convergence and NISQ Noise Analysis

arXiv cs.AI / 3/18/2026

📰 NewsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The study evaluates Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) for catastrophe insurance tail-risk pricing and indicates a potential quadratic speedup in sample complexity over classical Monte Carlo when estimating upper-tail loss percentiles.
  • The authors implement amplitude encoding of fitted lognormal catastrophe distributions into quantum oracles and demonstrate Grover amplification with up to 16 iterations using a Qiskit Aer simulator.
  • Seven experiments on synthetic data and NOAA Storm Events data (58,028 records) report an oracle-model advantage, note that strong classical baselines win when analytical access exists, and identify discretisation as the current bottleneck rather than estimation.
  • The results suggest QAE could enable higher-resolution tail estimation within practical budgets, though NISQ noise and discretisation remain challenges for real-world deployment.

Abstract

Classical Monte Carlo methods for pricing catastrophe insurance tail risk converge at order reciprocal root N, requiring large simulation budgets to resolve upper-tail percentiles of the loss distribution. This sample-sparsity problem can lead to AI models trained on impoverished tail data, producing poorly calibrated risk estimates where insolvency risk is greatest. Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE), following Montanaro, achieves convergence approaching order reciprocal N in oracle queries - a quadratic speedup that, at scale, would enable high-resolution tail estimation within practical budgets. We validate this advantage empirically using a Qiskit Aer simulator with genuine Grover amplification. A complete pipeline encodes fitted lognormal catastrophe distributions into quantum oracles via amplitude encoding, producing small readout probabilities that enable safe Grover amplification with up to k=16 iterations. Seven experiments on synthetic and real (NOAA Storm Events, 58,028 records) data yield three main findings: an oracle-model advantage, that strong classical baselines win when analytical access is available, and that discretisation, not estimation, is the current bottleneck.