AI Navigate

Learning When to Sample: Confidence-Aware Self-Consistency for Efficient LLM Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

arXiv cs.CL / 3/11/2026

Ideas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • Large language models (LLMs) use chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to achieve strong performance but often produce unnecessarily long reasoning paths that increase inference costs.
  • Self-consistency methods improve accuracy by aggregating multiple reasoning paths but add significant computational overhead.
  • The paper introduces a confidence-aware decision framework that adaptively chooses between single-path and multi-path reasoning based on uncertainty estimates from a single reasoning trajectory.
  • The framework is trained on MedQA data and generalizes well to other datasets like MathQA, MedMCQA, and MMLU without fine-tuning, achieving similar accuracy as multi-path methods while reducing token usage by up to 80%.
  • This approach provides an efficient and transferable mechanism to balance reasoning accuracy and inference cost in LLMs by leveraging intermediate signals from reasoning trajectories.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2603.08999 (cs)
[Submitted on 9 Mar 2026]

Title:Learning When to Sample: Confidence-Aware Self-Consistency for Efficient LLM Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

View a PDF of the paper titled Learning When to Sample: Confidence-Aware Self-Consistency for Efficient LLM Chain-of-Thought Reasoning, by Juming Xiong and 8 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong reasoning performance through chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, yet often generate unnecessarily long reasoning paths that incur high inference cost. Recent self-consistency-based approaches further improve accuracy but require sampling and aggregating multiple reasoning trajectories, leading to substantial additional computational overhead. This paper introduces a confidence-aware decision framework that analyzes a single completed reasoning trajectory to adaptively select between single-path and multi-path reasoning. The framework is trained using sentence-level numeric and linguistic features extracted from intermediate reasoning states in the MedQA dataset and generalizes effectively to MathQA, MedMCQA, and MMLU without additional fine-tuning. Experimental results show that the proposed method maintains accuracy comparable to multi-path baselines while using up to 80\% fewer tokens. These findings demonstrate that reasoning trajectories contain rich signals for uncertainty estimation, enabling a simple, transferable mechanism to balance accuracy and efficiency in LLM reasoning.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.08999 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2603.08999v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.08999
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Juming Xiong [view email]
[v1] Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:34:06 UTC (273 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Learning When to Sample: Confidence-Aware Self-Consistency for Efficient LLM Chain-of-Thought Reasoning, by Juming Xiong and 8 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
Current browse context:
cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Links to Code Toggle
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.