AI Navigate

CVPR workshop farming citations - how is this ethical?? [D]

Reddit r/MachineLearning / 3/13/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep Analysis
Read original →
共有:

Key Points

  • The post alleges that the CVPR 2026 PHAROS-AIF-MIH workshop requires participants to cite 13 papers authored by the organizers that are unrelated to the challenge, and to upload their paper to arXiv to be eligible.
  • The author contends this could be a form of citation farming, potentially involving citations from many authors across numerous papers.
  • The post questions the ethics and fairness of such a requirement and urges the community to flag or address the issue.
  • The author worries this practice could undermine the integrity of CVPR competitions and asks for ideas on how to raise attention or take action.

I cam across the PHAROS-AIF-MIH workshop at CVPR 2026 and one of the condition to participate in their challenge is to cite 13 papers by the challenge organizer and they are not related to the challenge. 13! 13 papers! And that too with multiple authors. And it is mandatory to upload your paper to arxiv to be eligible for this competition.

Citing 13 non-related papers and uploading paper to arxiv. Isn't it clearly citation farming attempt by organizers? And it will be not a small number, it will be close to a thousand.

I'm not sure how things work, but this is not what we all expect from a CVPR competition. Can we do something to flag this? We can't let this slide, can we?

submitted by /u/ade17_in
[link] [comments]

関連おすすめサービス

※当サイトはアフィリエイト広告を利用しています
🎧

Notta搭載AI議事録イヤホン ZENCHORD1

AI時代の仕事術。Notta搭載で会議の議事録を自動生成するスマートイヤホン。

🎙️

AI搭載ボイスレコーダー Plaud

世界100万人が愛用。AIで文字起こし・要約を自動化するボイスレコーダー。

🖼️

画像高画質化AIツール Aiarty Image Enhancer

AIで画像を高画質化。写真・イラストを簡単にアップスケール。