AI Navigate

LLM as a Meta-Judge: Synthetic Data for NLP Evaluation Metric Validation

arXiv cs.CL / 3/11/2026

Ideas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper proposes a framework called 'LLM as a Meta-Judge' that uses large language models to generate synthetic evaluation datasets by semantically degrading real data, replacing costly human annotations for validating NLG evaluation metrics.
  • This method enables scalable validation of evaluation metrics across multiple NLP tasks such as Machine Translation, Question Answering, and Summarization without relying on human judgments.
  • The approach shows high meta-correlation (above 0.9) with human benchmark rankings, demonstrating its reliability especially in multilingual question answering scenarios.
  • The framework provides an alternative solution for metric validation in languages or datasets where human annotations are unavailable or expensive to acquire.
  • The authors plan to release their code and synthetic data publicly to facilitate further research and application in NLP evaluation metric validation.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2603.09403 (cs)
[Submitted on 10 Mar 2026]

Title:LLM as a Meta-Judge: Synthetic Data for NLP Evaluation Metric Validation

View a PDF of the paper titled LLM as a Meta-Judge: Synthetic Data for NLP Evaluation Metric Validation, by Luk\'a\v{s} Eigler and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Validating evaluation metrics for NLG typically relies on expensive and time-consuming human annotations, which predominantly exist only for English datasets. We propose \textit{LLM as a Meta-Judge}, a scalable framework that utilizes LLMs to generate synthetic evaluation datasets via controlled semantic degradation of real data, replacing human judgment. We validate our approach using \textit{meta-correlation}, measuring the alignment between metric rankings derived from synthetic data and those from standard human benchmarks. Experiments across Machine Translation, Question Answering, and Summarization demonstrate that synthetic validation serves as a reliable proxy for human judgment, achieving meta-correlations exceeding 0.9 in multilingual QA and proves to be a viable alternative where human judgments are unavailable or too expensive to obtain. Our code and data will become publicly available upon paper acceptance.
Comments:
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.09403 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2603.09403v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.09403
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Lukáš Eigler [view email]
[v1] Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:15:19 UTC (121 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled LLM as a Meta-Judge: Synthetic Data for NLP Evaluation Metric Validation, by Luk\'a\v{s} Eigler and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
Current browse context:
cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Links to Code Toggle
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.