AI Navigate

Gender Fairness in Audio Deepfake Detection: Performance and Disparity Analysis

arXiv cs.AI / 3/11/2026

Ideas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • Audio deepfake detection focuses on distinguishing real human voices from AI-generated synthetic voices, which is crucial due to potential misuse in identity theft and impersonation.
  • The study analyzes gender fairness in audio deepfake detection models using the ASVspoof 5 dataset and a ResNet-18 classifier, comparing performance across various audio features and with a baseline AASIST model.
  • Conventional performance metrics like Equal Error Rate (EER) can mask gender disparities, while fairness-aware metrics reveal significant differences in error distribution between genders.
  • The findings stress the necessity of incorporating fairness metrics in evaluation to identify demographic-specific weaknesses and to build more equitable and reliable detection systems.
  • This work pioneers fairness-aware approaches in audio deepfake detection, highlighting a critical but underexplored aspect in AI voice biometrics research.

Computer Science > Sound

arXiv:2603.09007 (cs)
[Submitted on 9 Mar 2026]

Title:Gender Fairness in Audio Deepfake Detection: Performance and Disparity Analysis

View a PDF of the paper titled Gender Fairness in Audio Deepfake Detection: Performance and Disparity Analysis, by Aishwarya Fursule and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Audio deepfake detection aims to detect real human voices from those generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and has emerged as a significant problem in the field of voice biometrics systems. With the ever-improving quality of synthetic voice, the probability of such a voice being exploited for illicit practices like identity thest and impersonation increases. Although significant progress has been made in the field of Audio Deepfake Detection in recent times, the issue of gender bias remains underexplored and in its nascent stage In this paper, we have attempted a thorough analysis of gender dependent performance and fairness in audio deepfake detection models. We have used the ASVspoof 5 dataset and train a ResNet-18 classifier and evaluate detection performance across four different audio features, and compared the performance with baseline AASIST model. Beyond conventional metrics such as Equal Error Rate (EER %), we incorporated five established fairness metrics to quantify gender disparities in the model. Our results show that even when the overall EER difference between genders appears low, fairness-aware evaluation reveals disparities in error distribution that are obscured by aggregate performance measures. These findings demonstrate that reliance on standard metrics is unreliable, whereas fairness metrics provide critical insights into demographic-specific failure modes. This work highlights the importance of fairness-aware evaluation for developing a more equitable, robust, and trustworthy audio deepfake detection system.
Comments:
Subjects: Sound (cs.SD); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.09007 [cs.SD]
  (or arXiv:2603.09007v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.09007
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Aishwarya Fursule [view email]
[v1] Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:52:12 UTC (469 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Gender Fairness in Audio Deepfake Detection: Performance and Disparity Analysis, by Aishwarya Fursule and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
Current browse context:
cs.SD
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Links to Code Toggle
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.