Decompose, Look, and Reason: Reinforced Latent Reasoning for VLMs

arXiv cs.CL / 4/10/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper addresses a key limitation of vision-language models (VLMs): they often fail at complex multi-step visual reasoning because information can be lost when intermediate reasoning is represented in text-based chain-of-thought (CoT).
  • It proposes “Decompose, Look, and Reason (DLR),” a reinforced latent reasoning framework that decomposes a query into textual premises, extracts premise-conditioned continuous visual latents, and generates answers using grounded rationales.
  • DLR includes a three-stage training pipeline and introduces a “Spherical Gaussian Latent Policy” designed to improve exploration quality in the latent space during reinforcement-style training.
  • Experiments on vision-focused benchmarks reportedly show consistent gains over multiple strong baselines, including text-only methods, interleaved multimodal CoT, and prior latent reasoning approaches, along with improved step-by-step interpretability.

Abstract

Vision-Language Models often struggle with complex visual reasoning due to the visual information loss in textual CoT. Existing methods either add the cost of tool calls or rely on localized patch-based embeddings that are insufficient to extract semantics in multi-step reasoning. We propose \emph{"Decompose, Look, and Reason" (DLR)}, a reinforced latent reasoning framework that dynamically decomposes queries into textual premises, extracts premise-conditioned continuous visual latents, and deduces answers through grounded rationales. We introduce a three-stage training pipeline and propose a novel Spherical Gaussian Latent Policy to enable effective exploration in the latent space. Extensive experiments on vision-centric benchmarks show that DLR consistently outperforms strong baselines, including text-only, interleaved multimodal CoT, and latent reasoning methods, while providing superior stepwise interpretability.