IndustryAssetEQA: A Neurosymbolic Operational Intelligence System for Embodied Question Answering in Industrial Asset Maintenance

arXiv cs.AI / 4/28/2026

📰 NewsDeveloper Stack & InfrastructureIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper introduces IndustryAssetEQA, a neurosymbolic operational intelligence system that performs embodied question answering for industrial asset maintenance by combining episodic telemetry representations with an FMEA knowledge graph.
  • It targets weaknesses seen in LLM-only maintenance assistants, such as generic, weakly grounded explanations and lack of verifiable provenance for safety-critical decision-making.
  • Experiments across four industrial asset domains (rotating machinery, turbofan engines, hydraulic systems, and cyber-physical production systems) show IndustryAssetEQA improves multiple evaluation metrics versus LLM-only baselines.
  • The system also sharply reduces expert-rated overclaims, dropping from 28% to 2% (about a 93% reduction), indicating more trustworthy, testable reasoning.
  • Reproducibility resources are provided via the linked GitHub repository, including code, datasets, and the FMEA-KG.

Abstract

Industrial maintenance environments increasingly rely on AI systems to assist operators in understanding asset behavior, diagnosing failures, and evaluating interventions. Although large language models (LLMs) enable fluent natural-language interaction, deployed maintenance assistants routinely produce generic explanations that are weakly grounded in telemetry, omit verifiable provenance, and offer no testable support for counterfactual or action-oriented reasoning that undermine trust in safety-critical settings. We present IndustryAssetEQA, a neurosymbolic operational intelligence system that combines episodic telemetry representations with a Failure Mode Effects Analysis Knowledge Graph (FMEA-KG) to enable Embodied Question Answering (EQA) over industrial assets. We evaluate on four datasets covering four industrial asset types, including rotating machinery, turbofan engines, hydraulic systems, and cyber-physical production systems. Compared to LLM-only baselines, IndustryAssetEQA improves structural validity by up to 0.51, counterfactual accuracy by up to 0.47, and explanation entailment by 0.64, while reducing severe expert-rated overclaims from 28% to 2% (approximately 93% reduction). Code, datasets, and the FMEA-KG are available at https://github.com/IBM/AssetOpsBench/tree/IndustryAssetEQA/IndustryAssetEQA.