Article and Comment Frames Shape the Quality of Online Comments

arXiv cs.CL / 3/31/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper tests framing theory in online news discussions by analyzing 1M comments across 2.7K news articles and measuring comment quality as “comment health” (constructive, good-faith contributions).
  • It finds that article framing significantly predicts comment health even when controlling for the topic, and that comments aligned with the article frame are generally healthier.
  • It also shows that unhealthy top-level comments tend to trigger more unhealthy subsequent responses, suggesting a contagion or amplification effect independent of the specific frame.
  • The study connects discourse-quality research to computational framing and proposes downstream applications, including a proactive, frame-aware LLM-based system to reduce unhealthy discourse.

Abstract

Framing theory posits that how information is presented shapes audience responses, but computational work has largely ignored audience reactions. While recent work showed that article framing systematically shapes the content of reader responses, this paper asks: Does framing also affect response quality? Analyzing 1M comments across 2.7K news articles, we operationalize quality as comment health (constructive, good-faith contributions). We find that article frames significantly predict comment health while controlling for topic, and that comments that adopt the article frame are healthier than those that depart from it. Further, unhealthy top-level comments tend to generate more unhealthy responses, independent of the frame being used in the comment. Our results establish a link between framing theory and discourse quality, laying the groundwork for downstream applications. We illustrate this potential with a proactive frame-aware LLM- based system to mitigate unhealthy discourse