Uncertainty-Aware Foundation Models for Clinical Data

arXiv cs.LG / 4/7/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper proposes an uncertainty-aware framework for clinical foundation models that treats each patient as a distribution over latent physiologic states rather than a single deterministic embedding.
  • It learns set-valued representations and enforces consistency across incomplete, irregular, and modality-dependent clinical observations to capture what is reliably inferable while explicitly encoding epistemic uncertainty.
  • The approach combines multimodal encoders with scalable self-supervised objectives, including reconstruction, contrastive alignment, and distributional regularization.
  • Experiments across multiple clinical tasks show improved predictive performance, better robustness to missing data, and improved uncertainty calibration versus strong baseline methods.
  • The authors argue that explicitly modeling what is not observed (uncertainty) is an important inductive bias for healthcare foundation models trained on heterogeneous clinical data.

Abstract

Healthcare foundation models have largely followed paradigms from natural language processing and computer vision, emphasizing large scale pretraining and deterministic representations over heterogeneous clinical data. However, clinical observations are inherently incomplete, reflecting sparse, irregular, and modality dependent measurements of an underlying physiologic state. In this work, we propose a framework for uncertainty aware foundation modeling that represents each patient not as a point embedding, but as a distribution over plausible latent states. By learning set valued representations and enforcing consistency across partial views of the same patient, the model captures what is invariantly inferable while explicitly encoding epistemic uncertainty. We integrate this formulation with multimodal encoders and scalable self supervised objectives, combining reconstruction, contrastive alignment, and distributional regularization. Across diverse clinical tasks, our approach improves predictive performance, robustness under missing data, and uncertainty calibration relative to strong baselines. These results suggest that modeling what is not observed rather than only what is constitutes a critical inductive bias for healthcare foundation models.