Uncertainty-Guided Label Rebalancing for CPS Safety Monitoring

arXiv cs.LG / 3/27/2026

📰 NewsSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper addresses extreme class imbalance in safety monitoring for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs), where unsafe events are rare and standard rebalancing methods struggle with time-series telemetry data.
  • It introduces U-Balance, which first trains a GatedMLP-based uncertainty predictor over telemetry windows to compute a behavioral uncertainty score linked to safety outcomes.
  • U-Balance then uses an uncertainty-guided label rebalancing (uLNR) strategy that probabilistically relabels high-uncertainty safe windows as unsafe to enrich informative boundary samples without generating synthetic data.
  • Experiments on a large-scale UAV benchmark with a 46:1 safe-to-unsafe ratio show behavioral uncertainty correlates with safety and that uLNR is more effective than alternative uncertainty fusion approaches.
  • U-Balance achieves a 0.806 F1 score, outperforming the best baseline by 14.3 percentage points while keeping inference efficiency competitive, with ablation results confirming contributions from both uncertainty prediction and uLNR.

Abstract

Safety monitoring is essential for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs). However, unsafe events are rare in real-world CPS operations, creating an extreme class imbalance that degrades safety predictors. Standard rebalancing techniques perform poorly on time-series CPS telemetry, either generating unrealistic synthetic samples or overfitting on the minority class. Meanwhile, behavioral uncertainty in CPS operations, defined as the degree of doubt or uncertainty in CPS decisions , is often correlated with safety outcomes but unexplored in safety monitoring. To that end, we propose U-Balance, a supervised approach that leverages behavioral uncertainty to rebalance imbalanced datasets prior to training a safety predictor. U-Balance first trains a GatedMLP-based uncertainty predictor that summarizes each telemetry window into distributional kinematic features and outputs an uncertainty score. It then applies an uncertainty-guided label rebalancing (uLNR) mechanism that probabilistically relabels \textit{safe}-labeled windows with unusually high uncertainty as \textit{unsafe}, thereby enriching the minority class with informative boundary samples without synthesizing new data. Finally, a safety predictor is trained on the rebalanced dataset for safety monitoring. We evaluate U-Balance on a large-scale UAV benchmark with a 46:1 safe-to-unsafe ratio. Results confirm a moderate but significant correlation between behavioral uncertainty and safety. We then identify uLNR as the most effective strategy to exploit uncertainty information, compared to direct early and late fusion. U-Balance achieves a 0.806 F1 score, outperforming the strongest baseline by 14.3 percentage points, while maintaining competitive inference efficiency. Ablation studies confirm that both the GatedMLP-based uncertainty predictor and the uLNR mechanism contribute significantly to U-Balance's effectiveness.
広告