Reasoning About Traversability: Language-Guided Off-Road 3D Trajectory Planning

arXiv cs.RO / 4/24/2026

📰 NewsModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper argues that off-road autonomous-driving datasets with weakly aligned language annotations limit end-to-end reasoning by vision-language models (VLMs), especially when actions and terrain geometry don’t match well.
  • It introduces a language refinement framework that restructures annotations into action-aligned pairs, allowing a VLM to generate refined scene descriptions and 3D future trajectories from a single image.
  • To improve terrain-aware planning, the authors propose a preference optimization method using geometry-aware hard negatives and explicitly penalizing trajectories that conflict with local elevation profiles.
  • They also define off-road-specific evaluation metrics for traversability compliance and elevation consistency, better reflecting off-road driving than conventional on-road benchmarks.
  • On the ORAD-3D benchmark, the approach reduces average trajectory error (1.01m to 0.97m) and improves traversability compliance (0.621 to 0.644) while lowering elevation inconsistency (0.428 to 0.322).

Abstract

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) enable high-level semantic reasoning for end-to-end autonomous driving, particularly in unstructured environments, existing off-road datasets suffer from language annotations that are weakly aligned with vehicle actions and terrain geometry. To address this misalignment, we propose a language refinement framework that restructures annotations into action-aligned pairs, enabling a VLM to generate refined scene descriptions and 3D future trajectories directly from a single image. To further encourage terrain-aware planning, we introduce a preference optimization strategy that constructs geometry-aware hard negatives and explicitly penalizes trajectories inconsistent with local elevation profiles. Furthermore, we propose off-road-specific metrics to quantify traversability compliance and elevation consistency, addressing the limitations of conventional on-road evaluation. Experiments on the ORAD-3D benchmark demonstrate that our approach reduces average trajectory error from 1.01m to 0.97m, improves traversability compliance from 0.621 to 0.644, and decreases elevation inconsistency from 0.428 to 0.322, highlighting the efficacy of action-aligned supervision and terrain-aware optimization for robust off-road driving.