AI-Mediated Explainable Regulation for Justice

arXiv cs.AI / 4/2/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper proposes an AI-mediated regulatory decision framework aimed at reducing the static, unexplained, and interest-group-influenced nature of current regulation-making.
  • It argues for an explainable and adaptable-by-design system using distributed AI to generate regulatory recommendations that can evolve as facts or public values change.
  • The approach models and reasons about multiple stakeholders via separate preference models and aggregates them in a “value sensitive” manner to support regulatory justice and legitimacy.
  • It outlines mechanisms for how stakeholders can submit and verify their preferences, emphasizing transparency and the ability to audit whether preferences were properly considered.
  • Overall, the authors position the system as a way to improve compliance and reduce perceptions of illegitimacy in the regulatory process by making decisions updateable and explainable.

Abstract

Present practice of deciding on regulation faces numerous problems that make adopted regulations static, unexplained, unduly influenced by powerful interest groups, and stained with a perception of illegitimacy. These well-known problems with the regulatory process can lead to injustice and have substantial negative effects on society and democracy. We discuss a new approach that utilizes distributed artificial intelligence (AI) to make a regulatory recommendation that is explainable and adaptable by design. We outline the main components of a system that can implement this approach and show how it would resolve the problems with the present regulatory system. This approach models and reasons about stakeholder preferences with separate preference models, while it aggregates these preferences in a value sensitive way. Such recommendations can be updated due to changes in facts or in values and are inherently explainable. We suggest how stakeholders can make their preferences known to the system and how they can verify whether they were properly considered in the regulatory decision. The resulting system promises to support regulatory justice, legitimacy, and compliance.