Resolving space-sharing conflicts in road user interactions through uncertainty reduction: An active inference-based computational model

arXiv cs.AI / 4/23/2026

📰 NewsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper proposes a theoretically grounded, active-inference-based computational model to simulate how two road users resolve space-sharing conflicts in interactive settings.
  • It identifies three mechanisms for uncertainty reduction during interaction: implicit communication through behavioral coupling, using normative expectations (e.g., stop signs and priority rules), and explicit communication.
  • In a simplified intersection scenario, normative and explicit communication cues can improve the probability of successful conflict resolution when agents behave as expected.
  • The study also shows a safety risk: if another agent violates normative expectations or provides misleading explicit information, over-reliance on these cues can lead to collisions.
  • The authors argue the same active-inference framework can be applied beyond traffic scenarios to model interactive behavior in other domains.

Abstract

Understanding how road users resolve space-sharing conflicts is important both for traffic safety and the safe deployment of autonomous vehicles. While existing models have captured specific aspects of such interactions (e.g., explicit communication), a theoretically-grounded computational framework has been lacking. In this paper, we extend a previously developed active inference-based driver behavior model to simulate interactive behavior of two agents. Our model captures three complementary mechanisms for uncertainty reduction in interaction: (i) implicit communication via direct behavioral coupling, (ii) reliance on normative expectations (stop signs, priority rules, etc.), and (iii) explicit communication. In a simplified intersection scenario, we show that normative and explicit communication cues can increase the likelihood of a successful conflict resolution. However, this relies on agents acting as expected. In situations where another agent (intentionally or unintentionally) violates normative expectations or communicates misleading information, reliance on these cues may induce collisions. These findings illustrate how active inference can provide a novel framework for modeling road user interactions which is also applicable in other fields.