Learning to Hint for Reinforcement Learning

arXiv cs.LG / 4/2/2026

📰 NewsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • GRPO is effective for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards but can fail via “advantage collapse” when all rollouts in a group get the same reward, producing little or no learning signal.
  • The paper proposes HiLL (Hint Learning for Reinforcement Learning), which jointly trains a “hinter” policy to generate adaptive hints on-the-fly and a “reasoner” policy to solve hard tasks under RL.
  • HiLL conditions hint generation on the reasoner’s current incorrect rollouts, aiming to tailor hints to the evolving failure modes rather than using fixed, one-size-fits-all scaffolds.
  • It introduces “hint reliance” to quantify how much successful (correct) trajectories depend on hints, and uses a transferability argument to train hints that improve performance even when hints are removed at test time.
  • Experiments across multiple benchmarks show HiLL outperforms GRPO and earlier fixed-hint or hint-based baselines, and the authors provide released code on GitHub.

Abstract

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is widely used for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards, but it often suffers from advantage collapse: when all rollouts in a group receive the same reward, the group yields zero relative advantage and thus no learning signal. For example, if a question is too hard for the reasoner, all sampled rollouts can be incorrect and receive zero reward. Recent work addresses this issue by adding hints or auxiliary scaffolds to such hard questions so that the reasoner produces mixed outcomes and recovers a non-zero update. However, existing hints are usually fixed rather than adapted to the current reasoner, and a hint that creates learning signal under the hinted input does not necessarily improve the no-hint policy used at test time. To this end, we propose Hint Learning for Reinforcement Learning (HiLL), a framework that jointly trains a hinter policy and a reasoner policy during RL. For each hard question, the hinter generates hints online conditioned on the current reasoner's incorrect rollout, allowing hint generation to adapt to the reasoner's evolving errors. We further introduce hint reliance, which measures how strongly correct hinted trajectories depend on the hint. We derive a transferability result showing that lower hint reliance implies stronger transfer from hinted success to no-hint success, and we use this result to define a transfer-weighted reward for training the hinter. Therefore, HiLL favors hints that not only recover informative GRPO groups, but also produce signals that are more likely to improve the original no-hint policy. Experiments across multiple benchmarks show that HiLL consistently outperforms GRPO and prior hint-based baselines, demonstrating the value of adaptive and transfer-aware hint learning for RL. The code is available at https://github.com/Andree-9/HiLL.