Autonomous Drift Learning in Data Streams: A Unified Perspective

arXiv cs.LG / 5/5/2026

📰 NewsSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper argues that assuming stationarity (unchanging data distributions and model behavior) is not realistic for truly autonomous learning systems.
  • It proposes a new three-dimensional taxonomy of “drift” that goes beyond traditional concept drift by separating time/stream, data/representation/semantics, and model/internal dynamics.
  • The taxonomy distinguishes time drift into stochastic arbitrary patterns versus structural rhythmic dynamics, and data drift into representation drift versus semantic drift.
  • It characterizes model drift as endogenous divergence captured through sequential plasticity, decentralized heterogeneity, and policy instability.
  • After reviewing 193 studies, the authors synthesize open problems and outline a roadmap to build self-evolving systems that learn autonomously under continuous change.

Abstract

In the pursuit of autonomous learning systems, the foundational assumption of stationarity, the premise that data distributions and model behaviors remain constant, is fundamentally untenable. Historically, the research community has addressed non-stationary environments almost exclusively under the scope of concept drift, focusing primarily on temporal shifts in streams. However, as learning systems become increasingly autonomous and complex, merely adapting to temporal non-stationarity is no longer sufficient. Evolving beyond this traditional perspective, we propose a novel, three-dimensional taxonomy that systematizes the field based on the operational state of the system. First, time stream drift distinguishes between stochastic arbitrary patterns and structural rhythmic dynamics. Second, data stream drift disentangles shifts in feature representations, identified as representation drift, from changes in underlying semantics, recognized as semantic drift. Third, model stream drift characterizes the internal endogenous divergence of learning systems through the lenses of sequential plasticity, decentralized heterogeneity, and policy instability. Based on this framework, we systematically review 193 representative studies and identify key open challenges. By bridging the fragmented paradigms of drift adaptation, continual learning, and temporal generalization, this survey outlines a roadmap for building self-evolving intelligent systems capable of learning autonomously through continuous change.