L\'evy-Flow Models: Heavy-Tail-Aware Normalizing Flows for Financial Risk Management

arXiv cs.LG / 4/2/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper introduces L’evy-Flows, a normalizing-flow framework that replaces the usual Gaussian base distribution with Variance Gamma (VG) and Normal-Inverse Gaussian (NIG) distributions to better model heavy-tailed financial returns.
  • It provides theoretical results showing how tail behavior is preserved or exactly matched under specific asymptotically linear or identity-tail Neural Spline Flow architectures.
  • The method retains key practical properties, including exact likelihood evaluation and efficient reparameterized sampling, which are important for training and downstream risk tasks.
  • Empirical tests on S&P 500 daily returns and other assets show large improvements in density estimation and risk calibration, including a 69% reduction in test negative log-likelihood for VG-based flows versus Gaussian flows.
  • VG-based flows achieve exact 95% VaR calibration, while NIG-based flows produce the most accurate Expected Shortfall estimates, highlighting stronger tail-risk modeling for financial risk management.

Abstract

We introduce L\'evy-Flows, a class of normalizing flow models that replace the standard Gaussian base distribution with L\'evy process-based distributions, specifically Variance Gamma (VG) and Normal-Inverse Gaussian (NIG). These distributions naturally capture heavy-tailed behavior while preserving exact likelihood evaluation and efficient reparameterized sampling. We establish theoretical guarantees on tail behavior, showing that for regularly varying bases the tail index is preserved under asymptotically linear flow transformations, and that identity-tail Neural Spline Flow architectures preserve the base distribution's tail shape exactly outside the transformation region. Empirically, we evaluate on S&P 500 daily returns and additional assets, demonstrating substantial improvements in density estimation and risk calibration. VG-based flows reduce test negative log-likelihood by 69% relative to Gaussian flows and achieve exact 95% VaR calibration, while NIG-based flows provide the most accurate Expected Shortfall estimates. These results show that incorporating L\'evy process structure into normalizing flows yields significant gains in modeling heavy-tailed data, with applications to financial risk management.