NeurIPS 2026 AC-Pilot, how much would you trust this? [D]

Reddit r/MachineLearning / 5/6/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep Analysis

Key Points

  • The post questions how NeurIPS 2026’s “AC-Pilot” system works in practice and whether reviewers will still fully trust scores and evaluations under the new guideline framing.
  • It argues that if a reviewer’s specific concerns are not included in the AC-compiled list, that reviewer may be less likely to adjust the score even when all listed concerns are addressed.
  • The author also challenges the emphasis that acceptance depends on sufficiently addressed concerns rather than raw scores, suggesting raw scores will still influence outcomes.
  • Overall, the piece is concerned that procedural changes may not eliminate subjectivity and could still affect reviewer willingness to update ratings.

I wonder how this AC-Pilot thing works for NeurIPS 2026.

The guidelines say that "What you are communicating is that the authors do not need to worry about concerns you have not listed, and that there is a real opportunity for acceptance if listed concerns are sufficiently addressed."

However if a reviewer sees that their questions are not on that list compiled by the AC, even if all the listed questions are properly addressed that particular reviewer will be less inclined to change the score, no?

Also despite that they kept emphasizing it's whether the concerns were sufficiently addressed that matters instead of the raw scores, we all know the raw scores matter, so eventually one still must answer all questions?

submitted by /u/dontknowwhattoplay
[link] [comments]