Few-Shot Left Atrial Wall Segmentation in 3D LGE MRI via Meta-Learning

arXiv cs.CV / 3/27/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper introduces a model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) framework for few-shot 3D left atrial wall segmentation in late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI, targeting thin geometry, low contrast, and limited expert labels.
  • It meta-trains on the left atrial wall task alongside auxiliary left and right atrial cavity tasks and uses a boundary-aware composite loss to prioritize accurate thin-wall delineation.
  • On a hold-out test set, MAML improves over supervised fine-tuning, reaching Dice score gains (e.g., 0.64 vs 0.52 DSC at 5-shot) and better HD95 (5.70 vs 7.60 mm) while approaching the fully supervised reference with more shots (20-shot).
  • The method shows robustness to domain shift, with performance degrading under unseen synthetic shift but still outperforming the baseline and maintaining consistent gains as the number of shots K increases.
  • Overall, the results indicate that reliable thin-structure boundary segmentation may be feasible with minimal additional labeling, supporting potential clinical translation for atrial remodeling assessment.

Abstract

Segmenting the left atrial wall from late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance images (MRI) is challenging due to the wall's thin geometry, low contrast, and the scarcity of expert annotations. We propose a Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) framework for K-shot (K = 5, 10, 20) 3D left atrial wall segmentation that is meta-trained on the wall task together with auxiliary left atrial and right atrial cavity tasks and uses a boundary-aware composite loss to emphasize thin-structure accuracy. We evaluated MAML segmentation performance on a hold-out test set and assessed robustness under an unseen synthetic shift and on a distinct local cohort. On the hold-out test set, MAML appeared to improve segmentation performance compared to the supervised fine-tuning model, achieving a Dice score (DSC) of 0.64 vs. 0.52 and HD95 of 5.70 vs. 7.60 mm at 5-shot, and approached the fully supervised reference at 20-shot (0.69 vs. 0.71 DSC). Under unseen shift, performance degraded but remained robust: at 5-shot, MAML attained 0.59 DSC and 5.99 mm HD95 on the unseen domain shift and 0.57 DSC and 6.01 mm HD95 on the local cohort, with consistent gains as K increased. These results suggest that more accurate and reliable thin-wall boundaries are achievable in low-shot adaptation, potentially enabling clinical translation with minimal additional labeling for the assessment of atrial remodeling.