daVinci-LLM:Towards the Science of Pretraining

arXiv cs.AI / 3/31/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper argues that foundational pretraining largely determines a language model’s ultimate capability ceiling, and that this phase is still insufficiently studied compared with post-training.
  • It introduces daVinci-LLM as an effort to combine industrial-scale compute with full academic research freedom, using a fully open release of data processing pipelines, training processes, and exploration results.
  • The authors use the Data Darwinism framework (an L0–L9 taxonomy from filtering through synthesis) to systematically structure and study how data processing choices affect pretraining outcomes.
  • They train a 3B-parameter model from scratch across 8T tokens with a two-stage adaptive curriculum, and run 200+ controlled ablations to quantify key drivers such as processing depth, domain-specific saturation dynamics, and compositional balance.
  • The study also highlights that evaluation protocol design can change how progress is interpreted, and the authors aim to enable cumulative “science of pretraining” through reproducible methodology.

Abstract

The foundational pretraining phase determines a model's capability ceiling, as post-training struggles to overcome capability foundations established during pretraining, yet it remains critically under-explored. This stems from a structural paradox: organizations with computational resources operate under commercial pressures that inhibit transparent disclosure, while academic institutions possess research freedom but lack pretraining-scale computational resources. daVinci-LLM occupies this unexplored intersection, combining industrial-scale resources with full research freedom to advance the science of pretraining. We adopt a fully-open paradigm that treats openness as scientific methodology, releasing complete data processing pipelines, full training processes, and systematic exploration results. Recognizing that the field lacks systematic methodology for data processing, we employ the Data Darwinism framework, a principled L0-L9 taxonomy from filtering to synthesis. We train a 3B-parameter model from random initialization across 8T tokens using a two-stage adaptive curriculum that progressively shifts from foundational capabilities to reasoning-intensive enhancement. Through 200+ controlled ablations, we establish that: processing depth systematically enhances capabilities, establishing it as a critical dimension alongside volume scaling; different domains exhibit distinct saturation dynamics, necessitating adaptive strategies from proportion adjustments to format shifts; compositional balance enables targeted intensification while preventing performance collapse; how evaluation protocol choices shape our understanding of pretraining progress. By releasing the complete exploration process, we enable the community to build upon our findings and systematic methodologies to form accumulative scientific knowledge in pretraining.