Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Derivative-Constrained PDEs

arXiv cs.LG / 4/16/2026

📰 NewsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper introduces Derivative-Constrained Physics-Informed Neural Networks (DC-PINNs) that extend standard PINN PDE solving by adding derivative-based constraints (e.g., monotonicity, convexity, bounds, incompressibility) as part of the optimization objective.
  • DC-PINNs encode nonlinear state and derivative constraints efficiently using automatic differentiation, enabling computed constraint terms beyond the PDE residual itself.
  • The framework uses self-adaptive loss balancing to automatically tune the relative weight of multiple objectives, reducing the need for manual hyperparameter tuning and architecture changes.
  • Experiments on benchmarks across heat diffusion, financial volatility under arbitrage-free constraints, and fluid flow with vortices show reduced constraint violations and improved physical fidelity compared with baseline PINN variants.
  • By explicitly steering training toward physically admissible minima grounded in energy minimum principles, DC-PINNs stabilize solutions even when the PDE residual alone appears small.

Abstract

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) recast PDE solving as an optimisation problem in function space by minimising a residual-based objective, yet many applications require additional derivative-based relations that are just as fundamental as the governing equations. In this paper, we present Derivative-Constrained PINNs (DC-PINNs), a general framework that treats constrained PDE solving as an optimisation guided by a minimum objective function criterion where the physics resides in the minimum principle. DC-PINNs embed general nonlinear constraints on states and derivatives, e.g., bounds, monotonicity, convexity, incompressibility, computed efficiently via automatic differentiation, and they employ self-adaptive loss balancing to tune the influence of each objective, reducing reliance on manual hyperparameters and problem-specific architectures. DC-PINNs consistently reduce constraint violations and improve physical fidelity versus baseline PINN variants, representative hard-constraint formulations on benchmarks, including heat diffusion with bounds, financial volatilities with arbitrage-free, and fluid flow with vortices shed. Explicitly encoding derivative constraints stabilises training and steers optimisation toward physically admissible minima even when the PDE residual alone is small, providing reliable solutions of constrained PDEs grounded in energy minimum principles.