AI/ML Conferences [D]

Reddit r/MachineLearning / 5/1/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisIndustry & Market Moves

Key Points

  • The post expresses disappointment that the review process for ICML 2026 appears unfair or ineffective despite authors addressing reviewers’ concerns.
  • It argues that the very high volume of submissions to top A* AI/ML conferences is overwhelming the current review system.
  • The author highlights cases where papers were rejected even after all reviewer concerns were resolved, suggesting inconsistencies in scoring and decision-making.
  • The post asks what alternative process could improve fairness and reliability in peer review for AI/ML conferences.

As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026. Given the sheer number of papers submitted to A* AI/ML conferences, the current review system does not seem to work well. For example, in some cases, papers are rejected despite the authors addressing all reviewers’ concerns, leading to substantial increases in scores. What could be a better way forward to ensure a fair review process?

submitted by /u/msgs008
[link] [comments]