In your own words: computationally identifying interpretable themes in free-text survey data

arXiv cs.CL / 3/31/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper introduces “In Your Own Words,” a computational framework designed to extract structured, interpretable themes from free-text survey responses for exploratory analysis.
  • It claims improved precision over prior computational methods for identifying these themes in unstructured text.
  • The authors demonstrate the framework on a new dataset of 1,004 U.S. participants describing race, gender, and sexual orientation.
  • The learned themes are presented as useful for generating more complete future survey questions, revealing within-category heterogeneity, and detecting discordance between self-identified and perceived identities.
  • The framework is positioned as broadly deployable across survey contexts to complement qualitative methods with systematic, theme-based analysis.

Abstract

Free-text survey responses can provide nuance often missed by structured questions, but remain difficult to statistically analyze. To address this, we introduce In Your Own Words, a computational framework for exploratory analyses of free-text survey data that identifies structured, interpretable themes in free-text responses more precisely than previous computational approaches, facilitating systematic analysis. To illustrate the benefits of this approach, we apply it to a new dataset of free-text descriptions of race, gender, and sexual orientation from 1,004 U.S. participants. The themes our approach learns have three practical applications in survey research. First, the themes can suggest structured questions to add to future surveys by surfacing salient constructs -- such as belonging and identity fluidity -- that existing surveys do not capture. Second, the themes reveal heterogeneity within standardized categories, explaining additional variation in health, well-being, and identity importance. Third, the themes illuminate systematic discordance between self-identified and perceived identities, highlighting mechanisms of misrecognition that existing measures do not reflect. More broadly, our framework can be deployed in a wide range of survey settings to identify interpretable themes from free text, complementing existing qualitative methods.