Causal Reconstruction of Sentiment Signals from Sparse News Data

arXiv cs.LG / 3/26/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper proposes treating sentiment-from-news as a causal signal reconstruction task rather than a direct classification problem to produce a stable latent temporal sentiment series from sparse article observations.
  • It introduces a modular three-stage pipeline that (1) aggregates article-level classifier scores onto a regular time grid using uncertainty- and redundancy-aware weighting, (2) fills gaps with strictly causal projection rules, and (3) applies causal smoothing to reduce noise.
  • Because ground-truth longitudinal sentiment labels are usually unavailable, the authors develop a label-free evaluation framework using stability diagnostics, information-preservation lag proxies, and counterfactual tests for causal compliance and redundancy robustness.
  • As an external validation, the reconstructed sentiment signals are compared with stock-price data across a multi-firm AI-news dataset (Nov 2024–Feb 2026), revealing a persistent three-week lead-lag pattern across pipeline settings.
  • The results argue that deployable sentiment indicators depend heavily on reconstruction methodology (handling sparsity, redundancy, and uncertainty), not only on improving the underlying classifier.

Abstract

Sentiment signals derived from sparse news are commonly used in financial analysis and technology monitoring, yet transforming raw article-level observations into reliable temporal series remains a largely unsolved engineering problem. Rather than treating this as a classification challenge, we propose to frame it as a causal signal reconstruction problem: given probabilistic sentiment outputs from a fixed classifier, recover a stable latent sentiment series that is robust to the structural pathologies of news data such as sparsity, redundancy, and classifier uncertainty. We present a modular three-stage pipeline that (i) aggregates article-level scores onto a regular temporal grid with uncertainty-aware and redundancy-aware weights, (ii) fills coverage gaps through strictly causal projection rules, and (iii) applies causal smoothing to reduce residual noise. Because ground-truth longitudinal sentiment labels are typically unavailable, we introduce a label-free evaluation framework based on signal stability diagnostics, information preservation lag proxies, and counterfactual tests for causality compliance and redundancy robustness. As a secondary external check, we evaluate the consistency of reconstructed signals against stock-price data for a multi-firm dataset of AI-related news titles (November 2024 to February 2026). The key empirical finding is a three-week lead lag pattern between reconstructed sentiment and price that persists across all tested pipeline configurations and aggregation regimes, a structural regularity more informative than any single correlation coefficient. Overall, the results support the view that stable, deployable sentiment indicators require careful reconstruction, not only better classifiers.