Why Machine Learning Models Systematically Underestimate Extreme Values II: How to Fix It with LatentNN
arXiv stat.ML / 3/26/2026
💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisTools & Practical UsageModels & Research
Key Points
- The paper argues that attenuation bias—caused by measurement errors in input variables—also affects neural networks, leading them to systematically underestimate extreme values in astronomical regression tasks.
- It generalizes a latent-variable approach previously used for linear regression by introducing LatentNN, which jointly learns network parameters and latent (error-free) input values via maximum joint likelihood.
- LatentNN is validated on synthetic 1D and multivariate correlated-feature setups as well as a stellar spectroscopy application, showing reduced bias relative to standard neural networks, especially in low signal-to-noise regimes.
- The method is reported to work best when measurement error is less than about half the intrinsic data range, with reduced effectiveness in extremely low signal-to-noise conditions with few informative features.
- The authors provide an open-source implementation of LatentNN to support improved inference for astronomical data where measurement noise is substantial.
Related Articles
Regulating Prompt Markets: Securities Law, Intellectual Property, and the Trading of Prompt Assets
Dev.to
Mercor competitor Deccan AI raises $25M, sources experts from India
Dev.to
How We Got Local MCP Servers Working in Claude Cowork (The Missing Guide)
Dev.to
How Should Students Document AI Usage in Academic Work?
Dev.to
I built a PWA fitness tracker with AI that supports 86 sports — as a solo developer
Dev.to