On the Sample Complexity of Learning for Blind Inverse Problems
arXiv stat.ML / 4/21/2026
💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research
Key Points
- The paper studies learning guarantees for blind inverse problems, where both the signal and the forward operator are partially unknown and standard non-blind methods fail due to identifiability and symmetry issues.
- It analyzes the problem through the framework of Linear Minimum Mean Square Estimators (LMMSEs), deriving closed-form optimal estimators and showing equivalences to Tikhonov-regularized formulations whose structure depends on the assumed distributions of the signal, noise, and random operator.
- The authors prove convergence behavior for the reconstruction error as noise and operator randomness decrease under a source condition assumption.
- They derive finite-sample error bounds that quantify how performance depends on noise level, problem conditioning, number of samples, and explicitly on the operator randomness, and confirm these predictions with numerical experiments.
- The work aims to improve reliability of data-driven blind approaches by supplying theoretical, interpretable learning characterizations rather than relying only on empirical performance.
Related Articles

Every time a new model comes out, the old one is obsolete of course
Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

We built it during the NVIDIA DGX Spark Full-Stack AI Hackathon — and it ended up winning 1st place overall 🏆
Dev.to

Stop Losing Progress: Setting Up a Pro Jupyter Workflow in VS Code (No More Colab Timeouts!)
Dev.to

Building AgentOS: Why I’m Building the AWS Lambda for Insurance Claims
Dev.to

Where we are. In a year, everything has changed. Kimi - Minimax - Qwen - Gemma - GLM
Reddit r/LocalLLaMA