[R] ICML Anonymized git repos for rebuttal

Reddit r/MachineLearning / 4/6/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

共有:

Key Points

A Reddit user asks whether submitting additional figures and code via anonymized git repositories (intended for paper rebuttals/discussion) violates any ICML policy.
They reference anonymized hosting approaches such as anonymous.4open.science as a way to share supplementary materials without revealing identity.
The user is considering adding more graphs during the discussion phase and wants confirmation that doing so will be accepted and not create compliance issues.
The discussion centers on governance of supplemental artifacts during ICML review/discussion workflows, particularly around anonymization and timing of additional materials.

A number of the papers I'm reviewing for have submitted additional figures and code through anonymized git repos (e.g. https://anonymous.4open.science/) to help supplement their rebuttal. Is this against any policy?

I'm considering submitting additional graphs during the discussion phase for clarity, and would like to make sure that won't cause any issues

submitted by /u/drahcirenoob
[link] [comments]

Black Hat Asia

AI Business

How Bash Command Safety Analysis Works in AI Systems

Dev.to

How I Built an AI Agent That Earns USDC While I Sleep — A Complete Guide

Dev.to

How to Get Better Output from AI Tools (Without Burning Time and Tokens)

Dev.to

How I Added LangChain4j Without Letting It Take Over My Spring Boot App

Dev.to

[R] ICML Anonymized git repos for rebuttal

Key Points

Related Articles

Black Hat Asia

How Bash Command Safety Analysis Works in AI Systems

How I Built an AI Agent That Earns USDC While I Sleep — A Complete Guide

How to Get Better Output from AI Tools (Without Burning Time and Tokens)

How I Added LangChain4j Without Letting It Take Over My Spring Boot App

関連おすすめサービス

Notta搭載AI議事録イヤホン ZENCHORD1

AI搭載ボイスレコーダー Plaud

画像高画質化AIツール Aiarty Image Enhancer