Comparison of the development status of various claw/assistant projects

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA / 5/5/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisIndustry & Market Moves

Key Points

  • The article compares the development health of multiple claw/assistant-style open-source projects by analyzing GitHub contributor activity and commit history.
  • It introduces a custom “Bus Factor” measure (based on how many contributors account for more than half of commits), along with the top author’s contribution percentage to infer project bus risk.
  • The analysis relies solely on commit counts, noting that this can overweight small documentation fixes relative to larger substantive commits.
  • The table indicates that many projects have very low bus factors (often 1–3), suggesting high key-person dependency despite some having active commit volume in recent months.
  • Overall, the author frames the results as a starting point for readers to judge sustainability and contributor concentration rather than a definitive assessment.

I was reading the Github of an assistant project I'm interested in, and one of the comments said it was looking in dire health. This made me wonder about the state of each project.

So I made a list of all the major tools I knew, added a bunch more I never heard of from an awesome-claw-clones or whatever repo, and crunched the data. The script for the data was vibecoded, I just gave instructions to Claude, disclaimer.

The definition of Bus Factor I used is: the minimum number of contributors whose combined commits account for more than half of the project's history. Not exactly the real definition, but I'm not familiar with any of these projects, plus you can use the stats to see the top dev's % and make up your own mind.

I used commit count as the only metric. So a single 300-line 'proper' commit has less weight than 2 commits that fixed typos in the doc. This is just for a reddit post, not arxiv.

Repo Bus Factor Top Author Top Author Contrib % Cmt Feb Cmt Mar Cmt Apr
picoclaw 15 Hoshina 7.6% 567 662 323
QwenPaw 6 Yuexiang XIE 12.2% 51 618 382
zeroclaw 4 Argenis 26.5% 1228 1162 317
nanobot 3 Re-bin 41.2% 552 484 609
ironclaw 3 Illia Polosukhin 29.0% 256 499 349
nanoclaw 2 gavrielc 47.6% 186 282 509
agent-zero 2 frdel 42.3% 183 349 98
openclaw 1 Peter Steinberger 58.8% 6988 8704 14586
hermes-agent 1 Teknium 51.7% 425 1955 3644
moltis 1 Fabien Penso 91.6% 1321 421 1008
nullclaw 1 Igor Somov 57.5% 437 968 185
AstrBot 1 Soulter 67.7% 334 283 177
angel-claw 1 Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer 100.0% 83 57 92
moxxy 1 Michal Makowski 65.8% 0 83 69
troublemaker 1 Anonymous 100.0% 56 163 57
zeptoclaw 1 qhkmdev90 81.5% 382 153 52
microclaw 1 everettjf 84.7% 588 237 31

.

.

Dead projects (total collapse in April):

Repo Bus Factor Top Author Top Author Contrib % Cmt Feb Cmt Mar Cmt Apr
hermitclaw 2 James Campbell 43.2% 44 0 0
mimiclaw 2 Asklv 40.2% 138 41 0
pickle-bot 1 zane 99.2% 661 276 10
safeclaw 1 Claude 84.5% 38 50 4
lettabot 1 Cameron 67.7% 220 133 3
Clawlet 1 Kxrbx 67.6% 122 22 1
subzeroclaw 1 jmlago 100.0% 12 1 1
atombot 1 daegwang 100.0% 0 3 0
autobot 1 Vitalii Elenhaupt 89.8% 65 23 0
babyclaw 1 YOUR NAME 100.0% 16 0 0
droidclaw 1 Sanju Sivalingam 94.8% 213 0 0
picobot 1 louisho5 91.8% 50 35 0
shrew 1 Salim 100.0% 14 3 0
supaclaw 1 Vincenzo Domina 99.3% 124 25 0
tinyclaw 1 Jian 93.9% 80 117 0
zclaw 1 tnm 92.2% 117 49 0
submitted by /u/dtdisapointingresult
[link] [comments]