On the Hybrid Nature of ABPMS Process Frames and its Implications on Automated Process Discovery

arXiv cs.AI / 4/27/2026

📰 NewsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper models an ABPMS (AI-augmented business process management system) “process frame” as a hybrid representation combining procedural and declarative process models that can execute semi-concurrently.
  • It argues for using an open-world assumption for procedural models, interpreting procedures as constraints on activities rather than as strict, explicit execution requirements.
  • This constraint-like view is presented as analogous to declarative languages such as Declare, where each constraint directly affects only the activities it targets.
  • Building on that analogy, the authors propose mapping discovered declarative constraints into equivalent procedural fragments to enable a process (frame) discovery approach.
  • Overall, the work links the “hybrid nature” of process frames to how framed autonomy could emerge in automated process discovery systems.

Abstract

A core component of any AI-Augmented Business Process Management System (ABPMS) is the process frame, which gives the system process-awareness and defines the boundaries in which the system must operate. Compared to traditional process models, the process frame should, in principle, provide a somewhat more permissive representation of the managed processes, such that the (semi) autonomous behavior of an ABPMS, referred to as framed autonomy, could emerge. At the same time, it is not limited to a single linguistic or symbolic formalism and may incorporate heterogeneous knowledge ranging from predefined procedures to commonsense rules and best practices. In this paper, we conceptualize the notion of an ABPMS process frame as a hybrid business process representation, consisting of semi-concurrently executed procedural and declarative process models. We rely on our earlier works to outline the execution semantics of this type of process frame, arguing in favor of adopting the open-world assumption of the declarative paradigm also for procedural process models. The latter leads to a constraint-like interpretation, where each procedural model is considered to constrain the activities within that model, without imposing explicit execution requirements nor limitations on activities that may be present in other models. This is analogous to existing declarative languages, such as Declare, where each constraint has a direct effect only on the specific activities being constrained. Given this similarity, we propose mapping subsets of discovered declarative constraints into equivalent semi-concurrently executed procedural fragments, thus laying the foundation for a corresponding process (frame) discovery approach.