L-PRISMA: An Extension of PRISMA in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)

arXiv cs.AI / 3/23/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisTools & Practical Usage

Key Points

  • The article proposes L-PRISMA, an extension of the PRISMA framework to address GenAI-assisted evidence synthesis in systematic reviews.
  • It highlights challenges from GenAI, including non-determinism, hallucination, and bias amplification, that threaten reproducibility and auditability.
  • It proposes a hybrid workflow combining human-led synthesis with a GenAI-assisted pre-screening step, using a deterministic statistical layer to enhance reproducibility.
  • It outlines guidelines for integrating GenAI into PRISMA processes to provide a responsible, transparent pathway for adoption.

Abstract

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework provides a rigorous foundation for evidence synthesis, yet the manual processes of data extraction and literature screening remain time-consuming and restrictive. Recent advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs), offer opportunities to automate and scale these tasks, thereby improving time and efficiency. However, reproducibility, transparency, and auditability, the core PRISMA principles, are being challenged by the inherent non-determinism of LLMs and the risks of hallucination and bias amplification. To address these limitations, this study integrates human-led synthesis with a GenAI-assisted statistical pre-screening step. Human oversight ensures scientific validity and transparency, while the deterministic nature of the statistical layer enhances reproducibility. The proposed approach systematically enhances PRISMA guidelines, providing a responsible pathway for incorporating GenAI into systematic review workflows.