Learning to Reason with Insight for Informal Theorem Proving

arXiv cs.AI / 4/20/2026

📰 NewsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper argues that informal theorem proving for LLMs is bottlenecked by a lack of “insight,” specifically the ability to recognize core techniques needed to solve complex problems.
  • It introduces a new framework and the DeepInsightTheorem hierarchical dataset that extracts core techniques and proof sketches in addition to final proofs.
  • To leverage the dataset, the authors propose a Progressive Multi-Stage SFT training approach that imitates a human learning trajectory from basic proof writing to more insightful reasoning.
  • Experiments on difficult mathematical benchmarks show that the insight-aware generation strategy improves performance over baseline methods.
  • Overall, the work suggests that explicitly teaching models to identify and apply core techniques can meaningfully strengthen mathematical reasoning ability.

Abstract

Although most of the automated theorem-proving approaches depend on formal proof systems, informal theorem proving can align better with large language models' (LLMs) strength in natural language processing. In this work, we identify a primary bottleneck in informal theorem proving as a lack of insight, namely the difficulty of recognizing the core techniques required to solve complex problems. To address this, we propose a novel framework designed to cultivate this essential reasoning skill and enable LLMs to perform insightful reasoning. We propose \mathtt{DeepInsightTheorem}, a hierarchical dataset that structures informal proofs by explicitly extracting core techniques and proof sketches alongside the final proof. To fully exploit this dataset, we design a Progressive Multi-Stage SFT strategy that mimics the human learning process, guiding the model from basic proof writing to insightful thinking. Our experiments on challenging mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that this insight-aware generation strategy significantly outperforms baselines. These results demonstrate that teaching models to identify and apply core techniques can substantially improve their mathematical reasoning.