ACIArena: Toward Unified Evaluation for Agent Cascading Injection

arXiv cs.CL / 4/10/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper highlights Agent Cascading Injection (ACI) as a major security risk in multi-agent systems, where a compromised agent leverages inter-agent trust to spread malicious instructions and trigger system-wide failures.
  • It introduces ACIArena, a unified evaluation framework with systematic test suites covering multiple attack surfaces (external inputs, agent profiles, inter-agent messages) and attack objectives (instruction hijacking, task disruption, and information exfiltration).
  • ACIArena provides a shared specification and benchmark that supports both MAS construction and attack-defense modules, covering six common MAS implementations and 1,356 test cases.
  • The authors find that assessing robustness based only on network topology is insufficient, and that robust behavior depends on deliberate role design and controlled interaction patterns.
  • They also show that defenses validated in simplified settings may not generalize to real-world scenarios and can even introduce new vulnerabilities, motivating more comprehensive evaluation via ACIArena.

Abstract

Collaboration and information sharing empower Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) but also introduce a critical security risk known as Agent Cascading Injection (ACI). In such attacks, a compromised agent exploits inter-agent trust to propagate malicious instructions, causing cascading failures across the system. However, existing studies consider only limited attack strategies and simplified MAS settings, limiting their generalizability and comprehensive evaluation. To bridge this gap, we introduce ACIArena, a unified framework for evaluating the robustness of MAS. ACIArena offers systematic evaluation suites spanning multiple attack surfaces (i.e., external inputs, agent profiles, inter-agent messages) and attack objectives (i.e., instruction hijacking, task disruption, information exfiltration). Specifically, ACIArena establishes a unified specification that jointly supports MAS construction and attack-defense modules. It covers six widely used MAS implementations and provides a benchmark of 1,356 test cases for systematically evaluating MAS robustness. Our benchmarking results show that evaluating MAS robustness solely through topology is insufficient; robust MAS require deliberate role design and controlled interaction patterns. Moreover, defenses developed in simplified environments often fail to transfer to real-world settings; narrowly scoped defenses may even introduce new vulnerabilities. ACIArena aims to provide a solid foundation for advancing deeper exploration of MAS design principles.