From Risk to Rescue: An Agentic Survival Analysis Framework for Liquidation Prevention

arXiv cs.LG / 4/17/2026

📰 NewsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper introduces an autonomous agent for DeFi lending (e.g., Aave v3) that prevents user liquidations by acting proactively rather than relying on static health-factor thresholds.
  • It uses time-to-event (survival) analysis to compute a normalized “return period” risk metric from a numerically stable XGBoost Cox proportional hazards model, improving consistency across different transaction types.
  • The framework filters transient market noise using a volatility-adjusted trend score and distinguishes real insolvency risk from administrative “dust” cleanups.
  • To choose interventions, it runs a counterfactual optimization loop that simulates user actions to find the minimum capital needed to mitigate risk while maintaining a zero worsening rate.
  • Validation on a high-fidelity, protocol-faithful Aave v3 simulator using 4,882 high-risk user profiles shows effective liquidation prevention in imminent-risk cases where rule-based tools fail.

Abstract

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) lending protocols like Aave v3 rely on over-collateralization to secure loans, yet users frequently face liquidation due to volatile market conditions. Existing risk management tools utilize static health-factor thresholds, which are reactive and fail to distinguish between administrative "dust" cleanup and genuine insolvency. In this work, we propose an autonomous agent that leverages time-to-event (survival) analysis and moves beyond prediction to execution. Unlike passive risk signals, this agent perceives risk, simulates counterfactual futures, and executes protocol-faithful interventions to proactively prevent liquidations. We introduce a return period metric derived from a numerically stable XGBoost Cox proportional hazards model to normalize risk across transaction types, coupled with a volatility-adjusted trend score to filter transient market noise. To select optimal interventions, we implement a counterfactual optimization loop that simulates potential user actions to find the minimum capital required to mitigate risk. We validate our approach using a high-fidelity, protocol-faithful Aave v3 simulator on a cohort of 4,882 high-risk user profiles. The results demonstrate the agent's ability to prevent liquidations in imminent-risk scenarios where static rules fail, effectively "saving the unsavable" while maintaining a zero worsening rate, providing a critical safety guarantee often missing in autonomous financial agents. Furthermore, the system successfully differentiates between actionable financial risks and negligible dust events, optimizing capital efficiency where static rules fail.