Resource-Constrained UAV-Based Weed Detection for Site-Specific Management on Edge Devices

arXiv cs.CV / 4/28/2026

📰 NewsDeveloper Stack & InfrastructureModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper addresses a gap in understanding how object detection models perform for real-time UAV weed detection under real-world resource constraints on edge devices.
  • It proposes a deployment-oriented framework that covers UAV data acquisition, model development, and on-device inference, explicitly balancing detection accuracy with computational efficiency.
  • Across multiple modern detector families (YOLOv8–v12 and RT-DETRv1–v2), experiments on Jetson Orin Nano, AGX Xavier, and AGX Orin reveal clear accuracy–latency trade-offs.
  • High-capacity models reach up to 86.9% mAP50 but have latency too high for real-time use, while lightweight models achieve about 66%–71% mAP50 with sufficiently low latency.
  • The study identifies RT-DETRv2-R50-M as a strong efficiency-accuracy option (about 79% mAP50) and YOLOv10n as the fastest, with YOLOv11s and RT-DETRv2-R50-M providing the best overall balance for real-time UAV deployment.

Abstract

Weeds compete with crops for light, water, and nutrients, reducing yield and crop quality. Efficient weed detection is essential for site-specific weed management (SSWM). Although deep learning models have been deployed on UAV-based edge systems, a systematic understanding of how different model architectures perform under real-world resource constraints is still lacking. To address this gap, this study proposes a deployment-oriented framework for real-time UAV-based weed detection on resource-constrained edge platforms. The framework integrates UAV data acquisition, model development, and on-device inference, with a focus on balancing detection accuracy and computational efficiency. A diverse set of state-of-the-art object detection models is evaluated, including convolution-based YOLO models (v8-v12) and transformer-based RT-DETR models (v1-v2). Experiments on three edge devices (Jetson Orin Nano, Jetson AGX Xavier, and Jetson AGX Orin) demonstrate clear trade-offs between accuracy and inference latency across models and hardware configurations. Results show that high-capacity models achieve up to 86.9% mAP50 but suffer from high latency, limiting real-time deployment. In contrast, lightweight models achieve 66%-71% mAP50 with significantly lower latency, enabling real-time performance. Among all models, RT-DETRv2-R50-M achieves competitive accuracy (79% mAP50) with improved efficiency, while YOLOv10n provides the fastest inference speed. YOLOv11s and RT-DETRv2-R50-M offer the best balance between accuracy and speed, making them strong candidates for real-time UAV deployment.