Is Geometry Enough? An Evaluation of Landmark-Based Gaze Estimation
arXiv cs.AI / 3/27/2026
💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research
Key Points
- The paper evaluates landmark-based (geometric) gaze estimation as a lightweight, more interpretable alternative to appearance-based CNN approaches, which are accurate but computationally expensive and less transparent.
- It proposes a standardized landmark extraction and normalization pipeline across three large datasets (Gaze360, ETH-XGaze, and GazeGene) and trains lightweight regressors (XGBoost) alongside two neural landmark-based models (holistic MLP and a binocular-geometry siamese MLP).
- Results show landmark-based methods underperform in within-domain tests, plausibly because landmark detector noise degrades training and evaluation data.
- In cross-domain experiments, the proposed landmark-based MLPs generalize similarly to ResNet18 baselines, indicating that sparse geometric features can carry enough signal for robust gaze estimation.
- The authors release code and generated landmark datasets, arguing the approach can support efficient, interpretable, and privacy-friendly edge deployments.
広告
Related Articles

Got My 39-Agent System Audited Live. Here's What the Maturity Scorecard Revealed.
Dev.to

The Redline Economy
Dev.to

$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
Dev.to

From Scattershot to Sniper: AI for Hyper-Personalized Media Lists
Dev.to

The LiteLLM Supply Chain Attack: A Wake-Up Call for AI Infrastructure
Dev.to