CausalDisenSeg: A Causality-Guided Disentanglement Framework with Counterfactual Reasoning for Robust Brain Tumor Segmentation Under Missing Modalities

arXiv cs.CV / 4/16/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • 研究は、脳腫瘍のマルチモーダルMRIセグメンテーションが欠損モダリティに弱い主因を「様式(スタイル)バイアス」による近道学習として捉え、解決のための因果的枠組みを提案しています。
  • CausalDisenSegは構造因果モデル(SCM)に基づき、「解剖学的因果因子」と「スタイリスティック・バイアス因子」を分離することで、欠損時にも頑健な表現学習を目指します。
  • 具体的には、CVAEとHSIC制約で特徴の直交性を明示し、RCMで因果特徴を物理的腫瘍領域に結びつけ、さらに反実仮想推論(双対敵対戦略)でバイアス経路の残差効果を抑制します。
  • BraTS 2020での重度欠損モダリティ条件において既存手法を精度・一貫性の両面で上回り、同プロトコルでBraTS 2023を用いたクロスデータセット評価でもマクロ平均DSC 84.49のSOTAを報告しています。

Abstract

In clinical practice, the robustness of deep learning models for multimodal brain tumor segmentation is severely compromised by incomplete MRI data. This vulnerability stems primarily from modality bias, where models exploit spurious correlations as shortcuts rather than learning true anatomical structures. Existing feature fusion methods fail to fundamentally eliminate this dependency. To address this, we propose CausalDisenSeg, a novel Structural Causal Model (SCM)-grounded framework that achieves robust segmentation via causality-guided disentanglement and counterfactual reasoning. We reframe the problem as isolating the anatomical Causal Factor from the stylistic Bias Factor. Our framework implements a three-stage causal intervention: (1) Explicit Causal Disentanglement: A Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) coupled with an HSIC constraint mathematically enforces statistical orthogonality between anatomical and style features. (2) Causal Representation Reinforcement: A Region Causality Module (RCM) explicitly grounds causal features in physical tumor regions. (3) Counterfactual Reasoning: A dual-adversarial strategy actively suppresses the residual Natural Direct Effect (NDE) of the bias, forcing its spatial attention to be mutually exclusive from the causal path. Extensive experiments on the BraTS 2020 dataset demonstrate that CausalDisenSeg significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in accuracy and consistency across severe missing-modality scenarios. Furthermore, cross-dataset evaluation on BraTS 2023 under the same protocol yields a state-of-the-art macro-average DSC of 84.49.