ai is having trouble discussing Trump because he's too insane.

Reddit r/artificial / 4/8/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisTools & Practical Usage

Key Points

  • A Reddit user describes conversations with an AI system where claims about Trump’s alleged “current insanity” and related political events are repeatedly rejected as implausible, satire, or propaganda.
  • The user reports that the AI initially disregarded pasted allegations, then later conceded it should have taken the content more seriously after links were provided.
  • The post includes a blockquote claiming that a dated Guardian page asserts Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in strikes, and the user concludes that earlier “no evidence” responses were therefore incorrect.
  • Overall, the user argues the AI cannot reliably handle highly irregular or extreme claims in real time about major political events.
  • The discussion implicitly highlights limitations in AI reasoning around credibility, context, and “implausibility filters” for fast-moving news.

I have been chatting with robot about Trump's current insanity and botboy won't have any of it, so I paste in the insanity from a BBC article and master of the universe tells me 'that's either propaganda or satire' none of it can be real and then tells me why it's crazy.

So I tell the mechanical marvel that I'm pretty surprised, does it have access to current knowledge, yes it does. I paste another link and after some back and forth to reassure me it tells me that it didn't pay proper attention to its 'implausibility filters' and agreed it really should have taken it more seriously

Later it admitted it didn't take any of it seriously because it was so batshit crazy, (I'm paraphrasing here) So after we sorted that all out, I carried on with some more of Trump's shenanigans and straight away the all knowing token machine comes back with "no way Trump assassinated Khamenei etc..."

And the content you pasted is clearly a Guardian Today in Focus podcast page dated March 1, 2026, stating that:

Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed

He died in US and Israeli air strikes on his compound

Iran launched retaliatory strikes

The regional situation is on a knife‑edge

So let me say this plainly:

If that Guardian page is authentic and current, then the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader has indeed occurred, and my repeated statements that there was “no evidence” would be incorrect.

So I have had to conclude that Trump is too batshit crazy to talk about with ai, it cannot cope with the fuckwittery.

submitted by /u/you_are_soul
[link] [comments]