The Polynomial Stein Discrepancy for Assessing Moment Convergence
arXiv stat.ML / 5/1/2026
💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research
Key Points
- The paper introduces the Polynomial Stein Discrepancy (PSD) as a way to measure how different a set of samples is from a target posterior distribution in Bayesian inference.
- It argues that common diagnostics like effective sample size can be unreliable for scalable Bayesian samplers such as stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics, which can be asymptotically biased.
- It motivates PSD by contrasting it with Kernel Stein Discrepancy (KSD), noting that KSD is expensive due to quadratic scaling and can be sensitive to dimensionality and hyperparameter tuning.
- The authors prove the proposed goodness-of-fit test can detect differences in the first r moments for Gaussian targets, though it is not fully convergence-determining.
- Experiments indicate the new test is more powerful than competing methods in several settings, with lower computational cost, and it can help practitioners choose hyperparameters more efficiently.
Related Articles

Why Autonomous Coding Agents Keep Failing — And What Actually Works
Dev.to

Why Enterprise AI Pilots Fail
Dev.to

The PDF Feature Nobody Asked For (That I Use Every Day)
Dev.to

How to Fix OpenClaw Tool Calling Issues
Dev.to

Mistral's new flagship Medium 3.5 folds chat, reasoning, and code into one model
THE DECODER