Probabilistic data quality assessment for structural monitoring data via outlier-resistant conditional diffusion model

arXiv cs.LG / 4/30/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper introduces a structural health monitoring (SHM) data quality assessment method that diagnoses outliers and supports data cleaning before downstream analysis.
  • It proposes a conditional diffusion model that incorporates temporal context via a conditional embedding module, uses quartile normalization to reduce distribution skew, and applies a Huber loss for stronger outlier robustness.
  • In a univariate implicit autoregressive setting, the method assigns each data point an outlier probability (a numeric measure of “outlier-ness”) and also computes an overall quality score for the dataset.
  • Experiments on operational data from real-world structures show improved accuracy over multiple baseline approaches, including clustering-, isolation-based-, and deep reconstruction-based methods.
  • Ablation and hyperparameter analyses further validate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed framework.

Abstract

Data quality assessment is an essential step that ensures the reliability of the subsequent structural health monitoring (SHM) tasks. This study proposes a prediction deviation-based SHM data quality assessment method using a univariate implicit auto-regressive model, enabling outlier diagnosis and data cleaning. The proposed conditional diffusion model (CDM) augments the standard diffusion model with a conditional embedding module to incorporate temporal context, quartile normalization to mitigate distribution skew, and a Huber loss to enhance robustness against outliers. Within this univariate implicit autoregressive framework, each data point is assigned an outlier probability, quantifying its degree of "outlier-ness", and a global quality evaluation score is computed to characterize the overall dataset quality. Extensive case studies utilizing operational data from real-world structures demonstrate that the proposed framework significantly improves the accuracy of data quality assessment, outperforming other strong baselines representative of clustering, isolation-based, and deep reconstruction methods. The effectiveness and robustness of the proposed framework are further demonstrated by the findings of ablation experiments and hyperparameter analysis.