An Online Machine Learning Multi-resolution Optimization Framework for Energy System Design Limit of Performance Analysis

arXiv cs.LG / 4/3/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper addresses how integrated energy-system design suffers from model mismatch across fidelity levels, making it hard to identify why performance is lost from architecture to dynamic operation.
  • It proposes an online, ML-accelerated multi-resolution optimization framework that estimates an architecture-specific performance upper bound while reducing reliance on expensive high-fidelity simulations.
  • The method combines (1) a multi-objective architecture optimization for sizing/configuration selection with (2) an ML-guided multi-resolution receding-horizon optimal control strategy that adapts optimization resolution using predictive uncertainty.
  • Results on a 1 MW industrial heat-load pilot system show up to a 42% reduction in the architecture-to-operation performance gap versus a rule-based controller, and a 34% reduction in high-fidelity evaluations versus a non-ML multi-fidelity approach.
  • By making high-fidelity verification more tractable, the framework provides a practical way to quantify achievable operational performance for a chosen architecture.

Abstract

Designing reliable integrated energy systems for industrial processes requires optimization and verification models across multiple fidelities, from architecture-level sizing to high-fidelity dynamic operation. However, model mismatch across fidelities obscures the sources of performance loss and complicates the quantification of architecture-to-operation performance gaps. We propose an online, machine-learning-accelerated multi-resolution optimization framework that estimates an architecture-specific upper bound on achievable performance while minimizing expensive high-fidelity model evaluations. We demonstrate the approach on a pilot energy system supplying a 1 MW industrial heat load. First, we solve a multi-objective architecture optimization to select the system configuration and component capacities. We then develop an machine learning (ML)-accelerated multi-resolution, receding-horizon optimal control strategy that approaches the achievable-performance bound for the specified architecture, given the additional controls and dynamics not captured by the architectural optimization model. The ML-guided controller adaptively schedules the optimization resolution based on predictive uncertainty and warm-starts high-fidelity solves using elite low-fidelity solutions. Our results on the pilot case study show that the proposed multi-resolution strategy reduces the architecture-to-operation performance gap by up to 42% relative to a rule-based controller, while reducing required high-fidelity model evaluations by 34% relative to the same multi-fidelity approach without ML guidance, enabling faster and more reliable design verification. Together, these gains make high-fidelity verification tractable, providing a practical upper bound on achievable operational performance.