Boundary-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for Wildfire Spread Prediction

arXiv cs.CV / 5/6/2026

📰 NewsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper highlights that deep learning wildfire spread predictors often lack principled uncertainty quantification (UQ), limiting risk-aware emergency planning.
  • It argues that global evaluation metrics are insufficient for boundary-sensitive scenarios like wildfire spread, motivating a more operationally relevant assessment method.
  • The authors introduce the Fire-Centered Evaluation Region (FCER) framework, a spatially conditioned protocol to evaluate UQ specifically within critical fire zones.
  • Using the WildfireSpreadTS dataset, they compare an ensemble model with a distilled single-pass student model and find the student achieves comparable calibration and useful uncertainty ranking in boundary-relevant regimes.
  • The work provides open code via GitHub, enabling others to reproduce and build on the FCER evaluation approach and model comparison.

Abstract

Reliable wildfire spread prediction is vital for risk-aware emergency planning, yet most deep learning models lack principled uncertainty quantification (UQ). Further, for boundary-sensitive cases like wildfire spread, evaluating models with global metrics alone is often insufficient. To shift the focus of UQ evaluation toward a more operationally relevant approach, the Fire-Centered Evaluation Region (FCER) framework is introduced as a spatially conditioned protocol to characterize UQ within critical fire zones. Using FCER, an Ensemble is compared against an distilled single-pass student model on the WildfireSpreadTS dataset. The student model demonstrates comparable calibration and complementary uncertainty ranking in boundary-relevant regimes. Code is available at https://github. com/jonasvilhofunk/WildfireUQ-FCER