Surprisal Minimisation over Goal-directed Alternatives Predicts Production Choice in Dialogue
arXiv cs.CL / 5/4/2026
💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research
Key Points
- The paper treats utterance production as a probabilistic, cost-sensitive choice among contextual alternatives defined in information-theoretic terms.
- It distinguishes goal-directed alternatives (which realize a fixed communicative intent) from goal-agnostic, plausibility-based alternatives, enabling different speaker/listener interpretations of cost measures.
- The authors propose a method to generate both kinds of alternative sets using language models, and then analyze production choices in open-ended dialogue under deterministic and probabilistic cost minimisation.
- Their results show that surprisal minimisation relative to goal-directed alternatives best predicts production choices across both evaluation setups.
- The study argues that optimizing over LM-generated alternatives conditioned on goals and context offers a principled framework for examining both speaker and listener pressures in natural language production.
Related Articles
A very basic litmus test for LLMs "ok give me a python program that reads my c: and put names and folders in a sorted list from biggest to small"
Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

ALM on Power Platform: ADO + GitHub, the best of both worlds
Dev.to

Iron Will, Iron Problems: Kiwi-chan's Mining Misadventures! 🥝⛏️
Dev.to
Experiment: Does repeated usage influence ChatGPT 5.4 outputs in a RAG-like setup?
Dev.to
Find 12 high-volume, low-competition GEO content topics Topify.ai should rank on
Dev.to