How David Sacks crashed and burned in the White House

The Verge / 5/7/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisIndustry & Market Moves

共有:

Key Points

The New York Times reported that the White House was considering requiring government review of AI models before they are released, which the article frames as a potential reversal of earlier Trump-era positions.
The piece explains the apparent policy shift by focusing on David O. Sacks’s role (“AI and Crypto Czar”) and the internal pressures and political dynamics surrounding AI regulation.
It portrays Sacks’s influence as vulnerable to backlash and bureaucratic friction, culminating in a narrative of “crashed and burned” within the White House.
The article situates the developments within broader Washington intrigue, emphasizing how technology policy can rapidly change based on politics rather than a single consistent plan.

AI and Crypto Czar David O. Sacks speaks during a meeting of the White House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence Education at the White House. | Matt McClain/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Hello and welcome to Regulator, a newsletter exclusively for Verge subscribers about tech, politics, and Washington intrigue. (It's basically House of Cards, but for nerds.) Not a subscriber yet? You really should become one, and to save you a Google search, here is the direct link to do so! And do you think I should know something? Send it to tina.nguyen+tips@theverge.com.

On Monday, The New York Times reported that the White House was considering having the government review AI models before release. To the casual Verge reader, it appeared to be a total reversal in Donald Trump's policies. For the past year, he had been a vocal champion o …

Read the full story at The Verge.