Comparison of Modern Multilingual Text Embedding Techniques for Hate Speech Detection Task
arXiv cs.CL / 4/17/2026
💬 OpinionDeveloper Stack & InfrastructureTools & Practical UsageModels & Research
Key Points
- The study evaluates how well modern multilingual sentence embedding models can detect hate speech in multilingual and low-resource settings, focusing on Lithuanian, Russian, and English.
- It introduces LtHate, a new Lithuanian hate speech corpus built from news portals and social networks, and benchmarks six multilingual encoders (potion, gemma, bge, snow, jina, e5) using a unified Python pipeline.
- For each embedding approach, the paper compares one-class HBOS anomaly detection versus two-class CatBoost supervised classification, with and without PCA compression to 64-dimensional features.
- Two-class supervised models consistently and significantly outperform one-class anomaly detection across datasets, reaching up to 80.96% accuracy (AUC 0.887) for Lithuanian, 92.19% accuracy (AUC 0.978) for Russian, and 77.21% accuracy (AUC 0.859) for English.
- The results show that PCA compression largely retains discriminative information in the supervised setting, but can reduce effectiveness for the unsupervised anomaly detection setup.



![[Patterns] AI Agent Error Handling That Actually Works](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia2.dev.to%2Fdynamic%2Fimage%2Fwidth%3D1200%2Cheight%3D627%2Cfit%3Dcover%2Cgravity%3Dauto%2Cformat%3Dauto%2Fhttps%253A%252F%252Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%252Fuploads%252Farticles%252Frn5czaopq2vzo7cglady.png&w=3840&q=75)