InVideo AI generates a complete video from one text prompt — script, footage, voiceover, music, captions. Under 5 minutes. 50 million users monthly.
I spent time breaking down the actual credit math that most reviews skip.
The credit problem
Every generation and regeneration costs credits. No discount for the AI's mistakes.
| Quality | Credits per minute |
|---|---|
| Basic (stock assembly) | 2 |
| Pro (enhanced) | 80 |
| Ultra (highest) | 160 |
The Plus plan ($25/mo) gives you 100 credits. That's one 1-minute Pro video per month.
Add a human AI actor? +20 credits/min on top. A 1-minute Ultra video with an actor = 180 credits. The Plus plan can't even cover it.
The review score problem
InVideo runs two separate products: InVideo Studio (legacy template editor) and InVideo AI (prompt-based tool). Different platforms, different subscriptions.
But on Trustpilot, G2, and Capterra — the scores are bundled or reference the old product only. InVideo AI has no distinct profile on G2 or Capterra as of March 2026.
Any review quoting a single "InVideo" score without specifying which product is mixing data from two fundamentally different tools.
Who it's actually for
Works: faceless YouTube, social media shorts at volume, Basic quality (2 credits/min = real output)
Doesn't work: brand videos, precise editing, anything where you need creative control beyond chat-based commands
Full review with pricing tiers, comparison table (vs CapCut, Runway, Kling), and verdict:
