Calibration of the underlying surface parameters for urban flood using latent variables and adjoint equation

arXiv cs.LG / 5/6/2026

📰 NewsDeveloper Stack & InfrastructureModels & Research

Key Points

  • The study presents a Bayesian maximum-likelihood formulation to calibrate key urban surface parameters needed for more accurate urban flood simulations.
  • It uses an urban flood dynamical system as a surrogate model and introduces machine-learning-inspired latent variables to better represent uncertainties while remaining compatible with physical parameter calibration.
  • To speed up optimization, the authors derive an adjoint equation for the surrogate model to efficiently obtain gradient information.
  • They further reduce computational complexity by applying parameter sharing and localization techniques within the adjoint-based optimization.
  • Experiments show fast convergence in a simple test case and demonstrate calibration results for Manning’s coefficient on urban roads in “Test 8A,” with relative errors ranging from 1.16% to 13.88%.

Abstract

Calibrating the urban underlying surface parameters is crucial for urban flood simulation. We formulate the parameter calibration problem into an optimization problem within the Bayesian framework using the maximum likelihood principle. We adopt the urban flood dynamical system model as the surrogate model and innovatively introduce latent variables inspired by machine learning to represent more uncertainties, which can also be compatible with common physical parameter calibration. For more efficient optimization, we construct the adjoint equation of the surrogate model to obtain gradient information and propose the parameter sharing technique and the localization technique to reduce the computation complexity of the adjoint equation. A simple case verifies the proposed method can converge quickly and is insensitive to the observation time interval. In the case derived from Test 8A, we calibrate Manning's coefficient of urban roads, with a maximum relative error of 13.88% and a minimum of 1.16%.