Exposure-Normalized Bed and Chair Fall Rates via Continuous AI Monitoring

arXiv cs.CV / 3/25/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • A retrospective cohort study used continuous AI monitoring to estimate bed and chair fall rates based on exposure time (e.g., chair exposure-hours, bed exposure-hours) rather than traditional occupied bed-days.
  • Across August 2024 to December 2025, the dataset (3,980 monitoring units; 292,914 hourly rows) produced probability-weighted fall rates of 17.8 per 1,000 chair exposure-hours and 4.3 per 1,000 bed exposure-hours.
  • The primary Poisson model linked 40 adjudicated falls to eligible exposure hours and found an adjusted chair-versus-bed rate ratio of 2.35, though the result was not statistically significant (p=0.0907; wide confidence interval).
  • A separate broader observation cohort suggested a safety-relevant mechanism: 6 of 7 direct chair falls were associated with footrest-positioning failures.
  • Because the work is observational and confined to one health system, the authors treat the findings as hypothesis-generating and recommend further testing of safer chair setup practices rather than avoiding chairs altogether.

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study used continuous AI monitoring to estimate fall rates by exposure time rather than occupied bed-days. From August 2024 to December 2025, 3,980 eligible monitoring units contributed 292,914 hourly rows, yielding probability-weighted rates of 17.8 falls per 1,000 chair exposure-hours and 4.3 per 1,000 bed exposure-hours. Within the study window, 43 adjudicated falls matched the monitoring pipeline, and 40 linked to eligible exposure hours for the primary Poisson model, producing an adjusted chair-versus-bed rate ratio of 2.35 (95% confidence interval 0.87 to 6.33; p=0.0907). In a separate broader observation cohort (n=32 deduplicated events), 6 of 7 direct chair falls involved footrest-positioning failures. Because this was an observational study in a single health system, these findings remain hypothesis-generating and support testing safer chair setups rather than using chairs less.